rogerstriffler (dot com)

A little island in the vast digital sea

Menu
  • Home
  • intrepid media
Menu

after a fashion

Posted on July 20, 2001December 22, 2019 by roger

After finishing my last column (i’m ok. you’re ok. we’re a mess), in which I waxed philosophic on some of the things I’ve learned over the years about relationships, I began to wonder if there were other little gems of wisdom I could impart to you, the reader. To continue decanting the obvious, I decided on an unlikely topic: fashion.

Now, anyone who knows me will tell you that I simply didn’t get the fashion gene. I have no gift for putting together a fabulous outfit, for choosing clothes that accent my physique, or really for dressing to draw attention to myself (in any kind of positive way.)

My style, if you can call it that, is very casual. Most of my wardrobe consists of two things: jeans, and things that Ibelieve can be worn with jeans. I wear jeans to work, jeans when I go out at night, and jeans when I’m hanging out on the weekends. In fact, if I wear khaki pants and a button-down shirt to work, people ask me if I have a date or a job interview. 

This is not to say that I don’t have nice clothes, or that I never get dressed up, but let me put it this way: if I’m wearing a suit, you can rest assured that either someone has died, someone is getting married, or the tickets cost over $50 each. If something really looks good on me, it was probably a gift. 

So why do I feel even slightly qualified to give pointers on fashion? Because, in a culture obsessed with youth and beauty, where people will classify and categorize you based solely on your appearance, there are some fundamental rules that even the most fashion-impaired can apply. With the help of my personal image consultant (translation: gay friend with highly evolved fashion sense, and a vendetta against my closet and all it contains), I can present the following simple fashion truths:

Accessorizing: belts 
This one is simple. Your belt should match your shoes. Black shoes, black belt. Brown shoes, brown belt. If you’re wearing white shoes, your belt should probably be white as well — but frankly, if you’re wearing white shoes, you have bigger fashion fish to fry.

Socks
This one changes every so often, but right now the rule seems to be that the socks should match the shoes. If you feel compelled to wear them new-fangled fancy patterned socks, well, you’re only complicating matters, but try to have the predominant color match your shoes. White socks are the rule with sneakers. And please no black shoes/socks with shorts. That look is reserved for tourists in foreign countries. 

Sandals and Socks? 
One word: no. I’m afraid not. I don’t care how much granola you eat, or how long you’ve lived in the Pacific Northwest, if it’s cold enough for socks, it’s cold enough for shoes. End of story.

White Stockings
This one is for the ladies. Unless you are a nurse, in which case I assume you have no choice, do not wear white stockings. White is not slimming. While your dining room table may look wonderful supported on alabaster columns, your ass probably doesn’t.

Sweatsuits
Remember when only athletes wore sweatsuits? I miss that. These days they’re being worn by anyone who can’t fit into clothes that have buttons and zippers. Come on people, make some kind of effort. Let’s give the athletic wear back to the athletes.  
(There is one exception: if you’ve worked hard all of your life and have finally retired to Florida, wear whatever the hell you want; you’ve earned it. Besides, all your friends are doing it.)

Patterns
Although you can’t tell by some of the things people are wearing these days, there are some rules that have have always been around, and will always continue to be. A perfect example is the old Stripe rule. Vertical stripes make you look longer and thinner, horizontal stripes make you look wider or broader. Don’t try to convince yourself that you’re exempt. This is math. You will lose. Speaking of math, think about this for a second: black and white checkered cloth looks a lot like graph paper. If you stretch it across your butt, it’s going to follow every contour, revealing the butt’s exact size and shape. Do you really want to do this?

Of course, these are just general rules for mainstream America. Maybe that’s not you. Maybe you’re a club kid or a circuit boy, an alternative rocker or flower child. Maybe you’re a power-tie-packing corporate animal. In any case, the rules may be different and more complex. Just remember, like all rules, half the fun is in bending, stretching and breaking them.  

24 thoughts on “after a fashion”

  1. adam kraemer says:
    July 20, 2001 at 10:13 am

    I think athletic wear that doesn’t include sweatpants is okay, though – athletic shorts, warm-up pants, sports bras.

    Reply
  2. roger says:
    July 20, 2001 at 11:40 am

    Personally, Adam, I have no real need to see you in a sports bra, but ok, you’re right. Shorts, sweatshirts and the like are fine. It’s those matching pant/jacket combos – like you’re an olympian or something…

    Reply
  3. adam kraemer says:
    July 20, 2001 at 12:10 pm

    I miss my faux satin Adidas sweat suit from 3rd grade.

    Reply
  4. joe procopio says:
    July 20, 2001 at 12:35 pm

    Must correct – since I hang out with a LOT of the 18-24 crowd (brilliant’s demographic), I can tell you that the rule on socks with sneakers is, surpisingly, none, then BLACK, then white. Not kidding.

    Reply
  5. jael mchenry says:
    July 20, 2001 at 12:52 pm

    Are we using “the rule” as the preferred method, or what actually happens? Cuz black socks with sneakers is a sin.

    Reply
  6. rob stark says:
    July 20, 2001 at 1:02 pm

    Roger, have you thrown out that orange tank top? People thought you were gonna direct traffic.

    Reply
  7. joe procopio says:
    July 20, 2001 at 1:06 pm

    No jael, for real. This is what the kids are doing today. I figure we have three months before GAP picks up on it and starts selling specifically designed black sneaker socks. “The Sneaker Sock – $6.99/pr” – or is that old navy?

    Reply
  8. jael mchenry says:
    July 20, 2001 at 1:15 pm

    Old Navy would be “These socks cost less than my lipstick!” I love all their commercials the first three times, it’s times 4 through 8350 I can’t stand.

    Reply
  9. jael mchenry says:
    July 20, 2001 at 1:15 pm

    And there’s a guy at work who I mock mercilessly whenever he shows up in what I term “the graph paper shirt.” So I relate to the Patterns paragraph, Roger.

    Reply
  10. adam kraemer says:
    July 20, 2001 at 1:52 pm

    I actually refuse to shop at Old Navy on principle because I hate their commercials so much. I don’t want to think that any of my money would be going toward making more.

    Reply
  11. roger says:
    July 20, 2001 at 1:59 pm

    You know, I’m glad I watch so little TV. Everyone tells me how horrible the ads are and how they now won’t shop at Old Navy. I’ve never seen the ads and love the store. (Mostly because they sell things that go with jeans :o)

    Reply
  12. kelly keplinger says:
    July 20, 2001 at 2:03 pm

    I’m hurt that I was not consulted for this piece!! I had the unfortunate luck of having a blind date with a guy who had on a black leather jacket and white tennis shoes…. ummm… nooooo…!

    Reply
  13. adam kraemer says:
    July 20, 2001 at 2:21 pm

    Hey – I hear that’s very trendy in Burkina Faso.

    Reply
  14. adam kraemer says:
    July 20, 2001 at 2:22 pm

    I’d also like to just point out for the record that Ms. Kelly Keplinger is officially our 200th contributor. Let’s hear it for Kelly.

    Reply
  15. jael mchenry says:
    July 20, 2001 at 2:24 pm

    Woo-hoo!

    It’s equally trendy in Sao Tome e Principe.

    And the blind date with the leather and sneakers has got nothing on my personal second date fave, Tank Top Bob. Tank top, jacket, shorts, boots, lunch, March. Third date: none.

    Reply
  16. mike julianelle says:
    July 20, 2001 at 2:35 pm

    “Third date: none.”

    That is funny.

    Reply
  17. kelly keplinger says:
    July 20, 2001 at 2:38 pm

    I shudder to even mention another blind date fave who wore wind suit pants… everywhere… everyday… his quote: “They’re very comfortable”… ugh

    Reply
  18. jael mchenry says:
    July 20, 2001 at 2:40 pm

    And what exactly are “wind suit pants?” Definitely sounds iffy.

    Reply
  19. kelly keplinger says:
    July 20, 2001 at 2:45 pm

    They are the pants portion of those lovely “Olympian” like matching jacket / pants combo…

    Reply
  20. roger says:
    July 20, 2001 at 3:42 pm

    Thought y’all might appreciate my mom’s take on this:

    “And I always thought YOU were the fashion expert! Can’t think of anything you wear that isn’t “in” or that I don’t like (except maybe your leather pants!) Love, Mom”

    My mom likes the way I dress. I rest my case.

    Reply
  21. matt morin says:
    July 20, 2001 at 4:18 pm

    Here’s the fashion trick: Never wear anything ordinary, but never wear anything extraordinary either. Find the comfortable t-shirt that’s just a little different than everyone else’s. Find black shoes designed in a little different manner.

    Then you have no worries about going overboard (see: leather pants), but when people see what you have on, you inevitably get the “Hey, cool shoes/shirt/windbreaker” comments. People think you dress cool because you’re different…just not THAT different.

    Reply
  22. rick collins says:
    July 22, 2001 at 7:17 pm

    >>I had the unfortunate luck of having a blind date with a guy who had on a black leather jacket and white tennis shoes….<<

    You had a blind date with Joey Ramone?

    Reply
  23. jael mchenry says:
    July 23, 2001 at 8:27 am

    Matt, you rock.

    Reply
  24. matt morin says:
    July 23, 2001 at 4:30 pm

    Yeah, well…that’s what they tell me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to rick collins Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

search by tags

appreciation favorites humor lifestyle music pop culture writing

categories

  • Intrepid Media Articles
  • Trip Diaries

recent posts

  • September 7, 2007 by roger time and a song My grandfather once related a story to me about how...
  • February 20, 2004 by roger a shadowy business What were you doing February 2nd? If you’re a football...
  • November 27, 2002 by roger the space between I recently traveled from my current home in Raleigh back...
  • September 25, 2002 by roger i, spy Mandarin and Tonic. Never shaken; always stirred. And the Astin...
  • August 30, 2002 by roger bitter, party of two This is my first, and very likely my last, political...

latest comments

  1. David Lee Valdina on a bountiful harvestNovember 27, 2020

    Our Sally ? My wife and your sister ? Well, you did spell her name correctly. And I very much…

  2. robert melos on time and a songAugust 2, 2007

    Yet the Donna Summers disco version manages to make it a fun song to dance to. My high school was…

  3. roger on time and a songAugust 1, 2007

    I remember that song too, and you know what? I still don't understand what it means. Who the hell leaves…

  4. robert melos on time and a songJuly 31, 2007

    I realized tonight yet another song that takes me back to 1978, freshman year in high school, in English class.…

  5. roger on time and a songJuly 23, 2007

    Absolutely. Pub outside the Panthers stadium in Charlotte, the night Oasis and the Manic Street Preachers canceled on us. It…

©2026 rogerstriffler (dot com) | Theme by SuperbThemes